What's killing psychiatry?
Part 2
by Lisa Birk
Remember the archetypal Woody Allen psychiatrist? The one bathed in soft light,
head cocked, listening to Woody's story for 50 minutes every week? If that
archetype were an animal, he'd be on the endangered list.
The premise of traditional psychiatry was that the individual mattered. The
doctor's insight and empathy mattered, and the patient's story and feelings
mattered. Those values were reflected in the practice of psychiatry itself.
Referrals were word-of-mouth, based on a knowledge of patient and therapist.
Confidentiality was the basis of the relationship. Treatment sometimes included
drugs, but always included talk therapy, in which the patient had the
psychiatrist's full attention. The length of treatment was a private matter
between doctor and patient.
The premise of the new psychiatry is that profit matters. Profit depends on
efficiency, and efficiency is based on statistics. Same as any other industry.
How long does it take the average worker to bolt a fender onto a car? A worker
who takes longer knows he has to speed up or lose his job.
The principles of managed heath care, which now govern the psychiatric
treatment of all but the very rich, apply the same efficiency standards to
therapy. How long does it take the average doctor to "fix" the average
patient's depression? How can efficiency be improved? The result of this
approach is that every element of therapy is becoming mechanized; at worst,
psychiatry has become a matter of referrals by zip code, over-reliance on
medication, and treatment whose duration is determined by statistics-wielding
bureaucrats.
What happens when a profession charged with the most delicate of tasks --
treating the human psyche -- is driven by the most mechanistic sciences --
statistics, chemistry, economics? This story is about who benefits and who
loses under this new system of mental health care, and what is happening to
psychiatry itself.
Lisa Birk is a freelance writer living in Cambridge.