Lipstick liberation
Part 5
by Yvonne Abraham
What's left is Spice Girls feminism. As "Scary Spice" Mel B put it in a recent
Entertainment Weekly interview: "You can wear your Wonderbra, you can
wear your mascara, but you've got a bit of intelligence. . . . Don't
rely on your sexuality, but don't be afraid of it."
"Just because you've got a short skirt on and a pair of tits, you can still
say what you want to say. We're still very strong," Baby Spice Emma chimed in.
Heavy.
The Spice Girls have been anointed a feminist pop outfit by more than a few
writers. The Spicies themselves prefer the term Girl Power: personal, and
especially sexual, empowerment is central to their act. And sexy feminism
certainly works as a marketing approach (the fact that the quintet churning out
the prefab Brit-pop also have good abs and producers helps, too). They take
feminism's shell, and fill it up with lip gloss, ribbed condoms, and
girls-on-top innuendo. Nobody tells the Spice Girls what to do. They're young
and stylish and sexy as they wannabe. And they chew men up and spit 'em out:
I won't be hasty, I'll give you a try
If you really bug me then I'll say goodbye.
It's balder and tackier, but it's very much like what many third-wave writers
are saying: if every woman felt that free, we'd all be fine.
Feminism should now concern itself with "personal work," Karen Lehrman says.
"Under real feminism," she writes, "women have ultimate responsibility for
their problems, happiness and lives.
"The personal, in other words, is no longer political." Instead of agitating
on Capitol Hill, feminists would do better to revive consciousness-raising
groups for poor women, says Lehrman: it's all about self-esteem now. Which is
distressingly close to the touchy-feeliness she pillories in much of her
work.
None of the other third-wave writers goes quite as far as Lehrman, but hers
is
the logical conclusion of feminism's retreat into the personal. Girl Power has
its limits. Take away the sexual freedom and the guiltless push-up bras and
you're not left with much.
"For so many of these women," says Faludi, "what they want to break off and
call feminism is their own personal advancement, their own personal freedoms,
their own personal choices, so feminism must be about what I want to wear,
about fashion and beauty and flirting at the office. Here's our new brand of
feminism. Tastes good, less filling."
Problem is, a lot of women need something more substantial. But enough
about them. Let's talk about me.
Me, me, me.
Childhood extraordinarily ordinary . . . n
Yvonne Abraham can be reached at yabraham[a]phx.com.