Late bloomer
First-time state-rep candidate James Lukes draws name recognition from his
wife, but he still faces an uphill battle as an untested Republican in
Massachusetts
by Chris Kanaracus
AFTER AN AUGUST debate at Gary Rosen's Hot Dogs in Newton Square, many in the
crowd of about 100 partisans milled around on the sidewalk, chatting and
holding signs for their candidates. Democrats like Bob Spellane, who eventually
won the September 19 primary in a close victory over Joseph Spillane, held
court with scores of followers, as did Spillane and Democrat Harriet Lebow. In
contrast, James J. Lukes -- the lone Republican vying for the seat vacated
earlier this year by state representative Harriette Chandler -- seemed like a
lonely figure. His arms crossed and his mouth a wan line, Lukes stood with just
two supporters.
If Lukes is going to win on November 7, he'll have to overcome some pretty long
odds. It's no secret that the Republican Party is anemic in Massachusetts, and
the GOP is certainly weak in Paxton and Worcester's heavily Democratic West
Side, which are part of the 13th District. In fact, a Republican hasn't held
this seat in more than 20 years.
But the GOP hopeful performed pretty well during the pre-primary debate at the
hot dog stand. Lukes' centrist and conservative views provided a sharp contrast
to the homogeneity of the four Democrats in the field, and his persistent, even
frantic, manner of speaking suggested sincerity and firm convictions.
Lukes is no stranger to politics, of course. He's married to longtime Worcester
city councilor Konstantina Lukes, who, with her support for controversial
issues like needle exchange, exists outside the zeitgeist of local politics.
She's also long carried on a public rivalry with Mayor Raymond Mariano.
The Lukes family's political inclinations span the generations. The couple's
30-year-old son, Peter, is seen as the area's most promising young Republican,
and as such, he's been rewarded by Governor Paul Cellucci with a pending
appointment as register of probate at Worcester District Court, an $88,000
position.
James Lukes also enjoys solid name recognition. While her pair of mayoral bids
-- including one last year -- and an attempt at the District 5 council seat
failed, Konnie Lukes has served on the school committee and as an at-large
councilor for 14 years. It won't take much for most voters to draw a connection
between husband and wife. Still, Konnie Lukes has remained in the shadows
during her husband's campaign, on purpose, she claims.
"I don't want any baggage I might have to penalize my husband. This is his
campaign," says Konnie Lukes. And since her relative popularity stems less from
party affiliation than from her own strong personality, James Lukes remains
largely on his own.
That said, he's showing a fair amount of ambition in gunning for the House
seat. And the post vacated by Chandler, who's running for the state Senate, has
a tradition of introducing some of the local delegation's strongest voices on
Beacon Hill. The district itself is stocked with prosperous and politically
active voters.
The major issues in the race between the 60-ish Lukes (he won't specify his
age, citing a possible stigma) and Spellane, 30, the director of development
for the Central Massachusetts Housing Alliance, are pretty familiar: education
reform, health-care and prescription-drug coverage for seniors -- important,
but obvious topics. Save for the simmering dispute over a proposed access road
to Worcester Airport (which both Lukes and Spellane support, with
restrictions), the candidates haven't had much, other than personality, to hang
their campaigns on.
There's no question that Lukes is as likable a figure as his opponent. But
without a firm voter base of his own and not much in the way of a war chest,
James Lukes may be a little overly optimistic about his prospects for
November.
AT THE SAME time, Lukes is a viable candidate on his own merits. At a time when
health-care is once again a dominant issue, he can point to 25 years of
experience in the field. Lukes recently retired as head of addiction services
at St. Elizabeth's Hospital in Brighton. Before that, he headed a
heart-research wing at the former St. Vincent's Hospital and served on the
faculty of UMass Medical Center.
"I'm seasoned in this field," Lukes says. "I've worked with providers,
patients. I've dealt with budgets . . . my knowledge base [on health-care] will
help me deal with these issues." In contrast, Spellane has been active in
health-care reform at the grassroots level, but hasn't worked in the medical
field.
Unlike most Democrats, Lukes supports the Cellucci-Swift administration's
proposed rollback of the state income tax from 5.95 to five percent. The
proposal has been decried by many, most notably the teacher's unions, who say
education has historically been hardest hit when taxes are cut. Others suggest
that cutting taxes in times as flush as these isn't a good idea. Lukes, though,
says it is, citing ethical grounds. "When that law was passed, they promised it
would be lowered later on," he says, referring to 1989 legislation that raised
the tax to its current rate.
Also in contrast to Spellane, Lukes supports the idea of charter schools --
publicly funded schools operated without union restrictions -- and supports
removing the cap that allows only 50 charter schools in Massachusetts. The
centerpiece of his platform may be his call for a two-year budget, which, Lukes
says, will reduce the chance of shady deals in the frantic final days of
legislative sessions.
These are traditional, even predictable, conservative views. But much like his
wife, Lukes is not easily pigeonholed. He's anti-death penalty and pro-choice,
a somewhat unusual combo for a Republican. "I actually look at myself as a
Republicrat," he jokes. "I don't wear my "R" on my forehead."
Issues aside, one of the biggest questions is why Lukes hasn't run until now,
especially when one considers his wife's involvement in public life. "I had a
career, and I loved it," he says. "The bug never really bit me until now, but
in the back of my mind I always thought about it. I could be on the golf course
now. But I really want it. I want to contribute something. It might sound
schmaltzy, but I believe it."
Although civic idealism is nice, Lukes has just $3295 in his campaign war
chest, mostly because, he says, he doesn't like to twist supporters' arms.
But frankly, that's not enough to win a city-council seat, let alone a
state representative's contest against a strong Democrat. Beyond a paucity of
campaign funds, Lukes -- at least on the surface -- has yet to mount a truly
aggressive campaign. The candidate, however, says looks can be deceiving.
"We've been aggressive already," he says. "Don't believe that it's low-key.
It's not. We've got our chess pieces in place and we've been out there every
morning, whether it's a standout or knocking on doors." More fundraisers are
planned in the coming weeks, he adds.
And even Democrats with ample campaign funds and strong name recognition can be
fallible, as demonstrated by the way Loring Lamoureux, the incumbent clerk of
courts, trashed Mariano in the September primary. "It reinvigorated me," Lukes
says with a grin. Despite a robust campaign backed by more than 100
endorsements from elected officials, Mariano was trounced on a 60-40 margin by
the experienced, but relatively low-key, Lamoureux.
At the same time, Lukes faces stiff competition in the general election. In the
September primary, first-time candidate Spellane defeated three other
Democratic hopefuls through a combination of strong connections to labor, solid
fundraising (he brought in more than $30,000), aggressive door-to-door
campaigning, and a focused and distinctly liberal message.
Spellane also proved resilient, surviving a nasty -- if laughably small-time --
tiff with Joseph Spillane, his closest rival in the primary. First, in August,
Spellane claimed the pro-life Spillane had pulled strings to block his use of a
Knights of Columbus hall for a fundraiser. The dispute brought the irrelevant
(for a state's rep race) issue of abortion rights to the forefront, and led to
dissension within the congregation of Christ the King Church, of which both men
are members.
Then in September, Spillane charged that Spellane's campaign had conducted a
"push poll," in which callers asked area voters leading questions about other
candidates. A Tufts University grad student working for Spellane's campaign
asked about 300 13th District voters if they'd vote for Spillane if they knew
his father was an insurance lobbyist.
Despite the mud, Spellane squeaked past Spillane by 146 votes and left his
other challengers, prominent School Committee member Brian O'Connell and
management consultant Harriet Lebow, coughing in the dust.
Still, the Democrat says he's not about to underestimate Lukes. "Is he a
threat?" asks Spellane. "Absolutely. This horse race is only half over. My
campaign strategy won't change, no matter what."
Except, perhaps, for the hard words that marked his primary win over Spillane.
Both Spellane and Lukes have pledged their contest won't go negative. And in
truth, negativity between these candidates might be uncomfortable. Spellane
played Little League baseball with Peter Lukes, and at one time was actually
coached by James Lukes. While he notes the old-time connection, Spellane also
says he's not about to take it easy on his opponent. Since September 1, when
candidates were required to file financial records with the state Election
Commission, Spellane says his campaign has raised an additional $10,000.
But one factor that could hurt Spellane (and perhaps help Lukes) might come
from within Spellane's own party. At a September "unity" meeting held by area
Democrats, Spillane --unlike Lebow and O'Connell -- didn't rise to endorse
Spellane's campaign.
Spellane downplays the matter. But even a professed supporter, local talk-show
host and pundit Robert MaCauley, says this split could be an issue. "He
[Spillane] might help out Lukes, if only to hurt Spellane for the next time
around," MaCauley says. "I think Joe Spillane will be back." In any case,
Spellane would be wise to worry. Spillane lost, but he still garnered more than
2000 votes -- a more than ample swing vote come November.
IF YOU LOOK around, though, even this potential rub probably wouldn't put Lukes
over the top, largely because Massachusetts remains a lousy place to be a
Republican, despite the party's presence in the governor's office. Most
observers point to the lack of grassroots party-building by Republicans
Cellucci and his more charismatic predecessor, Bill Weld, since Weld was
elected in 1990. More recently, Cellucci has made it a point to reach out,
dispatching aides to candidates statewide, including Lukes, to dispense advice.
Just advice, though. "Yeah, they come out here and talk strategy," Lukes says
with a laugh. "But it's not like they bring the war wagon out or any money with
them."
The GOP has even had difficulty getting enough candidates to run. Many
Democrat-held seats in the area are unopposed. And for the most part, what
Republican challengers do exist haven't fared much better than Lukes has.
The only remotely competitive bipartisan local race this year is between
Representative David Bunker (D-Holden) and Republican Mark Ferguson. Ferguson
won a special election for the seat in March after incumbent Harold Lane left
to take another job. But just days later, Ferguson was forced to cede to Bunker
when a re-count showed that Bunker had won by 13 votes.
The area's only Republican incumbent representative is Paul Frost (R-Auburn),
who is gunning for a second term against little-known Democrat Susan Weagle.
Harriette Chandler will likely cruise to victory over moderate Chris Loconto, a
local lawyer, for the 1st Worcester state Senate seat. Loconto, 30, has had to
canvass an area about four times the size of the 13th Worcester district
without the benefit of a machine like Chandler's. Indeed, Chandler-Loconto
looks as much like a David-Goliath situation as any this year. Loconto's war
chest stands at about $7000. In comparison, Chandler spent $150,000 on her
successful primary win over Joe Early Jr., and she begins the post-primary
period with $43,442.
For sure, this suggests a less than hopeful outlook for Lukes. But he shows no
sign of fear. In fact, he's talking as if the race is in his pocket. "This is
not going to be a career for me," he says. "I don't expect to get on the best
committees. I just want people to take a step back and look at the candidates.
It's all I can ask."
Chris Kanaracus can be reached at ckanaracus[a]phx.com.
| home page |
what's new |
search |
about the phoenix |
feedback |
Copyright © 2000 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group. All rights reserved.
|