Questions |
Answers |
1. Many people
believe the state legislature remains in the grip of the lobbyist-funded
leadership, and that the local delegation is forced to march in lockstep with
the leadership's whim. As a legislator, how will you combat this perception?
|
Lobbyist influence, soft money, and clean-election laws are all interconnected.
I support the Clean Election Law, which should significantly reduce lobbyist
influence.
|
2. The use of term limits appeals to some as a way to block individuals
from choosing politics as a career, and to reduce stagnation in the
legislature. Do you support or oppose term limits, and why?
|
I oppose the idea of term limits because I believe that the voter is the best
source of term limits.
|
3. By providing public matching funds for candidates, a Clean Elections
law is meant to reduce soft-money contributions and diminish corporate
influence in the political process. Do you support or oppose a Clean Elections
law, and why?
|
I have consistently voted in the House for the Clean Elections Law which was
passed overwhelmingly twice by my constituents in the 13th Worcester
District.
|
4. Earlier this year, the state legislature passed a Patients' Bill of
Rights in response to a ballot initiative. Do you support the terms of the
initiative, and is the legislation enough to address patients' needs?
|
Health-care is a complex, inter-related, evolving process. I am proud of my
role in enacting the Patients' Bill of Rights which has been strongly endorsed
by advocates of the ballot initiative who no longer now support the
referendum.
|
5. One of the biggest concerns of senior voters is prescription-drug
coverage. What role, in your opinion, should state government play in providing
these drugs?
|
Only government can respond to those with no place else to turn. I led the
earlier efforts to develop the Senior Pharmacy Plan and Senior Pharmacy Plus to
help low-income seniors pay for their prescription drugs, and created our new
voluntary catastrophic prescription insurance plan to help all seniors pay for
their prescriptions.
|
6. School vouchers would allow parents to use public education funds to
pay for a private education for their children. Do you support or oppose school
vouchers, and why?
|
I oppose school vouchers. I do not believe that our tax dollars should be used
to support private education.
|
7. MCAS educational testing is on everyone's mind these days. Is the
current system fair and worthwhile?
|
I strongly support a system of educational
accountability. However, I am opposed to any single test that is used to
determine whether or not a child is allowed to graduate from high school.
|
8. Town leaders in Holden have complained that Worcester charges too
much for use of the city's sewage system. What role should the next District 1
senator play in this debate?
|
I am familiar with the issue because of my past work in securing state funding
to improve the area's infrastructure. The next state senator should act as a
facilitator in efforts to find a solution to the Holden-Worcester sewage
issues.
|
9. What role should the District 1 senator play in the debate over the
future of Wachusett Regional High School?
|
It is the role of the residents of the community to participate in the debate
over the future of Wachusett Regional High School. The senator's role should be
to facilitate the implementation of that decision.
|
10. With a crunch on affordable housing in Worcester, is there any
benefit to building a modest amount of low-to-moderate-income housing in
surrounding towns such as Holden or West Boylston?
|
The question of building low- to moderate-income housing in surrounding towns
like Holden or West Boylston is a public-policy decision that should
appropriately be made by the residents of those communities.
|
11. A strong presence at the State House is crucial to ensure the
completion of Union Station, including a parking garage, the addition of more
trains, and private development on surrounding parcels. What will you do to
ensure the success of Union Station?
|
I will continue to fight for the full 10-round-trip Worcester-Boston commuter-
rail service that the administration has been unwilling to deliver, to complete
the parking needs, and to encourage private development on surrounding
parcels.
|
12. A healthy local economy needs a preponderance of taxable property.
What specific things will you do to increase the level of such property in the
district, particularly in Worcester, which contains a large number of abandoned
buildings?
|
Abandoned buildings should be removed at the owner's expense or taken over by
the city and put to useful, tax producing purposes.
|
13. Are you pro-abortion or anti-abortion, and why?
|
I am pro-choice, because I believe in a woman's right to make her own decisions
regarding her body.
|
14. What is your position on capital punishment, and why?
|
I support capital punishment for those most heinous of crimes. Such a
death-penalty bill must provide all defendants with complete procedural
safeguards, as well as access to DNA [testing] and other technology to assure
that an innocent person is not put to death.
|
15. List your top three priorities upon taking office, in order of
importance.
|
Health-care that is high-quality, affordable, and accessible to all
Educational excellence for all cities and towns.
Safe homes, schools and neighborhoods.
|
16. Why should people vote for you?
|
My six years in the legislature have produced a record of real accomplishments
and real ideas. I have fought for the needs of the people of Central
Massachusetts and have delivered them better health-care, a stronger education
system, and improved services.
|