Court gestures
Ray Mariano's campaign against Loring "Red" Lamoureux has made the normally
sleepy contest for clerk of Superior Court the hottest local race of the
season.
by Chris Kanaracus
It was just before summer when Loring "Red" Lamoureux and Worcester Mayor Ray
Mariano's battle for clerk of Superior Court began to intensify. Although
Lamoureux has remained a ghost figure in local political circles during his
three terms as clerk, it became clear his support was broader than his
low-profile suggested. And while Mariano has long been one of Worcester's
most-talked-about political figures, his popularity was less robust in other
parts of the county.
Mariano has campaigned feverishly since then with a barrage of radio,
television, and print ads, and the type of door-to-door stumping that he
probably hasn't done since his early days on the city council. Coupled with
more than 100 endorsements from politicians around the state, Mariano has made
an aggressive push. Lamoureux has taken strides, too. He hit the airwaves with
his own commercials, and is a top contender in this year's lawn-sign derby. And
Worcester County's legal community overwhelmingly supports Lamoureux's bid.
Still, it's Mariano's involvement that has transformed the normally sleepy
clerk's race into the hottest local campaign of this election season (see "Open
season," News, June 23).
The focus has been on each candidate's unique definition of the clerk's job,
which pays $88,000 and carries a comfortable six-year term. Lamoureux maintains
the clerk should have a law degree and 10 years of experience working in the
clerk's office. Such a pedigree is necessary, his supporters say, to ensure
that more than 5000 civil and criminal cases move smoothly through the system
each year.
Lamoureux's supporters say he's done a bang-up job, frequently citing a May
1999 article in Lawyers Weekly, which rated five superior court clerk's
offices around the state, based on
the staff's courtesy, knowledge, and efficiency. Only Lamoureux's office
received straight A's -- the type of excellence, his camp says, that comes only
with experience and training.
Mariano, on the other hand, bases his campaign around an entirely different
point of view: that the clerk should be an advocate. He says Lamoureux's
definition of the clerk as a passive administrator is lacking. Mariano charges
that Superior Court has become so bogged down under Lamoureux's watch that some
cases don't get settled for as long as five years (a characterization that
Lamoureux rejects). The mayor questions why Lamoureux hasn't actively pressed
legislators for more funding or looked for ways to improve the Superior Court's
operations -- things that Mariano asserts he'll do if elected. Mariano has also
released a 12-page plan that purports to contain the cure to the court's
ills.
Lamoureux and Mariano are so far apart in their view of the clerk's duties
(and, for sure, in their personalities and backgrounds), that this race,
curiously enough, presents the most clear-cut and perhaps the most difficult
choice for voters this year.
THE RACE has been hard-fought and nasty. Earlier this summer, Mariano alleged
that Lamoureux supporters used racial slurs against him on the campaign trail.
Lamoureux says the accusation is "repulsive," and that he's not responsible.
And an anonymous flyer circulated to area lawyers made much of Lamoureux's
"even temperament," hinting that the outspoken Mariano lacks the disposition to
be clerk.
You'd expect an aggressive effort from Mariano, 49, who has run for local
office 15 times since 1975, and whose calling card has always been his
impassioned, forceful rhetoric. He's come on like an attack dog during recent
debates. But Lamoureux has risen to the occasion, albeit somewhat more subtly.
Consider this exchange from an August 24 debate on the Jordan Levy Show,
concerning that vaunted "A" rating:
Mariano: Lawyers Weekly never rated the clerk. They rated
the courtesy and efficiency of his staff.
Lamoureux: I should think I'd be able to take some of the credit
for a good rating, since I'd no doubt get criticized if it [had been] a bad
one.
Yet while he's proven an able debater, Lamoureux, 68, never really saw Mariano
coming. He's spent 41 years working at the courthouse, first as an assistant
clerk, and later first-assistant clerk, before taking over for Philip Philbin,
who died in 1987. In 1988, Lamoureux retained the seat after surviving a
three-way race, and he went unopposed in 1994.
This year, it's wildly different. True to form, Mariano has been a rabidly
competitive challenger, and many observers say it's his race to lose.
But others say Lamoureux may have only himself to blame should he lose the
September 19 election. One observer questions why Lamoureux hasn't prepared or
planned ahead for a potential challenge: "If I was in his shoes, I'd be out at
events, talking to people, making those connections. Why hasn't he done that?"
In contrast, the observer points to long-time Registrar of Deeds Anthony
Vigliotti, saying, "[Vigliotti's] always been there, contributing to campaigns,
at events, in the mix, etc. But you never hear about his job either."
Lamoureux admits he's had to play catch-up. "If there's anything I would have
done differently, it would be to have held some fund-raisers," he says. "But I
couldn't ask people for money when I was running unopposed."
Then there's the so-called chicken poll, in which guests at the annual barbecue
of state Senator Richard Moore, a Democrat from Uxbridge, cast their primary
votes ahead of time. Much like Iowa's "straw poll," the fate of candidates at
the chicken poll is often borne out in the fall. This year, when the votes were
tallied in August, Mariano won on a commanding 104-38 margin. Ouch.
To be fair, Moore's barbecue is hardly Gallup headquarters, and the vote may
not represent the will of the general public. But it does speak for the
county's movers and shakers, and the chicken poll indicates Mariano's close
ties to them. Some 120 politicians from across the state, including Attorney
General Thomas Reilly and US Representative James McGovern, have endorsed the
Mariano campaign.
There's talk, though, that many in Mariano's army of well-wishers have a hidden
agenda: they just want him out of City Hall, a notion confirmed by several area
pols. While his tenure has been marked by accomplishment -- especially on
issues that effect the city's youth -- Mariano has many critics, who consider
him arrogant and divisive, and eager to latch on to high-profile issues for
publicity.
Lamoureux doesn't lack for his own supporters. Most of the legal community is
behind him, and these boosters are sure to spread the gospel. Town committees
in politically active Clinton and Blackstone have endorsed Lamoureux's
campaign. And he's sure to get the support of fans of former US Representative
Joe Early, whose son, Joe Early Jr., is running against Harriette Chandler for
the 1st Worcester state-senate seat.
But money-wise, with a war chest that's hovered around $40,000, Lamoureux is
well behind Mariano, who began the race with $146,000 and has a seasoned
campaign manager in Bill Eddy, president of the Democratic City Committee.
During a recent meeting at his down-home,
Casablanca-memorabilia-bedecked Main Street office, Lamoureux sounds
confident. "We've been encouraged by the response we've been getting throughout
the county," he says. "There's been excellent feedback from the debates we've
had. . . . People on the street come up to me all the time and say we're doing
well.
"I have never believed [advocacy] was ever a primary, or even a secondary
function of this job. . . . Let's say you have a 40-hour week. How much time
can you spend on advocacy? Everyone in the office, myself included, already has
a full day's work assigned to them. I don't know how to be a mayor. I know how
to do this."
Lamoureux admits advocacy can be a part of the job, and says he's done
it at times, but he adds that others already handle the load. "Three or four
times a year, the chief justices meet with the legislature to discuss funding.
And I've been content with the funding of my office."
Above all else, says Lamoureux, he hopes voters will recognize his record of
service, and keep him in the clerk's office. "All I can ask is that people
contemplate what this job needs," he says. "I just want to stress my
experience, and rely on the facts."
The clerk doesn't see a problem with a case backlog. Lamoureux says the court
uses three judge-mandated "tracks," or estimated time-frames, for various types
of cases. Mortgage foreclosures are on the `X' track, and take about six
months. Motor-vehicle torts line up on the `F' track and are based on a
two-year resolution. Thornier cases, such as medical-malpractice or
product-liability suits, have presumptive trial dates of three years.
"I don't set these time frames," Lamoureux says. "Based on the number of
available judges and courtrooms, this is the way things currently go." Also, he
adds, delays can occur for a number of reasons, such as ill or absent witnesses
and evidence testing.
The backlog issue was the focus of a recent Mariano campaign commercial. Over
footage of several individuals, a narrator asked viewers to "imagine" the
horrors of a four- or five-year wait if they were to file a case. Without
offering specifics, the commercial suggested its subjects had endured such an
experience.
Lamoureux's reaction to the spot, which he calls "a gross distortion," came
during the Jordan Levy debate. After learning the names of two of the people
pictured in the ad, he ran a background check to find the details of their
cases. He found that one, a motor-vehicle tort, had been resolved in slightly
more than two years. Another had indeed been filed more than five years ago,
but had been transferred to federal court a few months afterward. Mariano calls
Lamoureux's tactic "outrageous." Then again, you have to think Mariano could
have found folks with worse horror stories, if only to cover his bases.
But Lamoureux's move -- while slick -- didn't refute Mariano's contention the
courts are backlogged.
One local lawyer and courthouse employee, who asked to not be identified, says
an open secret has hovered over the race. "Delays, in a lawyerly sense, can be
a good thing," the source says. "Sometimes you need that extra time to make
sure your case moves forward in your favor."
MANY HAVE questioned why Mariano would run for the clerk's office. Some say
it's the $88,000 salary; as mayor, he makes only $18,000. Mariano, who also
works as a political consultant, dismisses the idea. "I make a nice living," he
says. "People have offered me two or three times as much [as the clerk's
salary] to come and work for them."
Instead, says Mariano, the appeal comes from a need for change. "Do we want a
passive administrator or do we want a leader?" he says. "He and his people say
that's the way the courts are supposed to run, and I disagree. I've got the
skill to go in there and not accept the status quo."
But it's Mariano's skills that Lamoureux's camp questions. For while he holds a
degree in public administration, Mariano isn't a lawyer, nor does he have any
experience in the clerk's office. While several clerks elsewhere in the state
court system don't have law degrees, all except one, Joseph Nucci of Suffolk
County's criminal court, have worked in the clerk's office. Lamoureux says that
if Mariano wins, it would throw the court system "into chaos."
Mariano scorns the notion. "Look. There was a learning curve when I became
mayor. There still is. I learn things every day. And I expect there will be one
here. It's certainly going to be a challenge, but I think I can do it."
He already has his blueprints laid out. Mariano's eight-page plan suggests a
"for the people" approach. He hopes to reopen Superior Court sessions in
Fitchburg, and to recruit retired judges to sit at unused court buildings in
other parts of the county. (The latter suggestion has also been proposed by
Lamoureux.) To further address the system's alleged backlog, Mariano says he'd
publicize alternative dispute resolution, or ADR programs, which use private
mediators to settle cases in a non-courtroom setting.
And he says he'll push for changes in the rules that govern evidence handling,
another function of Lamoureux's office. Currently, the law requires only one
party in a case to be present when evidence is examined. Representatives from
the district attorney's office weren't present earlier this year when lawyers
for Benjamin La Guer, who has long maintained he was wrongly convicted of
raping a Leominster woman, viewed evidence at the court to prepare for DNA
testing, raising the possibility of contamination.
Mariano acknowledges that Lamoureux wasn't legally bound to notify prosecutors
or police of the evidence handling, but says that such events wouldn't happen
on his watch. His campaign's latest television commercial highlights this
issue.
But it's the advocacy portion of his plan that best fits Mariano's skills and
background, and which could give him the edge in this election. Throughout his
25 years in public office, the mayor has overseen Worcester's ongoing revival
and has been lauded for his leadership skills, most notably in the wake of
December's Worcester Cold Storage building fire, which claimed the lives of six
city firefighters. Worcester voters -- indeed, the entire county -- won't soon
forget the mayor's heartfelt, fiery speech at the firefighters' Centrum
memorial service, which was broadcast nationwide.
Mariano's plan calls for extended office hours (and satellite offices), a
customer-feedback form, and monthly forums involving the clerk and the
Worcester County Bar Association. Also, he says he'll form a task force of
retired judges, experienced lawyers, and others to monitor the office's
performance.
Indeed, Mariano seems eager for scrutiny. "I want people to hold me
accountable," he says. "Loring Lamoureux says he works for the judges. I say he
works for the people."
Whether Mariano, if elected, can transform the clerk's office into a post that
fits his campaign's vision remains to be seen. But, at least, the legislature
will find him hard to ignore.
To hear local politicos tell it, it's a safe bet he'll get the chance.
Additional reporting contributed by Melissa Houston.
Chris Kanaracus can be reached at
ckanaracus[a]phx.com.
| home page |
what's new |
search |
about the phoenix |
feedback |
Copyright © 2000 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group. All rights reserved.
|