Out of site
WAM looks at 20 years of installation art
by Leon Nigrosh
BLURRING THE BOUNDARIES: 25 YEARS OF INSTALLATION ART At the Worcester Art Museum,
55 Salisbury Street, through January 3, 1999.
You could say that installation art got its start in the caves of Lascaux,
France, about 17,000 years ago when people attempted to create a magical
environment by drawing mystical images directly on the cavern walls. Through
the years, the art of architecture has produced variations that range from the
gilded opulence of the Catherine Palace in Pushkin to the ticky-tack of
Levittown, Pennsylvania, each prompting its appropriate emotional response.
Into the 17th century, artists worked with architects creating stained-glass
windows for the great cathedrals, mosaics for government buildings, and
sculptured bas-reliefs for public arenas. But there was an unaccountable
estrangement during the Age of Enlightenment, and art and architecture went
separate ways. New materials made easel painting more practical and profitable.
Rather than having to wait for commissions, artists had the freedom to create
what and when they wanted. They also had the portability to bring their works
to the attention of many more potential buyers.
It was not until the early part of the 20th century that artists such as Pablo
Picasso and Marcel Duchamp began to break away from the traditionally
standardized gallery-size picture frame and develop works of enormous scale.
Later, Barnett Newman's, Jackson Pollock's, and Frank Stella's vast canvases
captured the attention of the art world and returned painting to an
architectural scale. During the 1960s and 1970s, Allan Kaprow's
Happenings blended art with theater, while Claes Oldenberg, George
Segal, and Edward Keinholz assembled three-dimensional tableaux that both
startled and delighted gallery and museum-goers. Taking art off the wall and
involving the viewer brought vitality back into a rather moribund art scene.
Of course, the major problem with site-specific art is that it is often just
that -- suitable for exposure in a single place. Only a few large and wealthy
galleries or museums can afford to keep such works in perpetuity. Only the
occasional outdoor public work can be sustained in this manner, usually through
government and private trust funds. After a suitable period of time,
installations tend to be dismantled and stored in some dark place or broken up
-- with photographs as the only evidence that they ever existed.
We are therefore quite lucky and privileged that 19 installations, originally
assembled by 20 international, contemporary artists, have been resurrected,
refurbished, and reconstructed throughout the Worcester Art Museum.
WAM director Jim Welu made arrangements with the Museum of Contemporary Art in
San Diego to have truckloads of oddly shaped crates shipped here for the only
New England showing of this exhibition. The museum's new curator of
contemporary art, Jessica Morgan, has tailored the disparate group of works to
fit into certain galleries with an eye toward appropriate context.
While any work of art can either benefit or suffer from the place it is seen,
installations often change drastically if shown out of their origin. The room
is too small, the ceiling too high or low, the shape of the walls and their
color, and the lighting all affect the dramatic intent of a particular piece.
With all of this in mind, Morgan has done an outstanding job of creating the
proper mood for many of the works in this exhibit.
To inaugurate the museum's new contemporary gallery, she has placed Ann
Hamilton's linings and Chris Burden's The Reason for the Neutron
Bomb in this brilliant white space. These two large works are distinctly
different from each other in several ways. Burden's piece can be seen all at
once. In fact, seeing all 50,000 nickels (lent by Flagship Bank) laid in rows
on the floor drives home his point about the Soviet Union's military might.
Although this work was more potent when first shown in 1979 at the height of
the Cold War, each coin and matchstick represents a Soviet tank in numbers that
surpass anything the US or NATO could muster at the time.
Hamilton's offering is directed inward, a padded cell turned inside out. For
the full effect you must venture inside the glass-lined room. The walls are
covered with quotations from naturalist John Muir's 19th-century notebook and
there is grass underfoot. A video, played in slow motion, of a woman's mouth
filling with water completes the eerie effect. This was Hamilton's 1990
response to the national debate on censorship in the arts, but today it could
engender feelings of isolation in anyone who enters.
Anish Kapoor's small work The Healing of St. Thomas greatly benefits
from Morgan's choice of contextual venue. If shown in a contemporary gallery,
this tiny piece, no more than a 12-inch red gash, would be lost or would need a
large, well-written wall panel to explain the artist's intent. Morgan has it
mounted alone on a white wall in the 13th and 14th Century Early Italian
gallery. Even if you are only vaguely familiar with the Biblical story of
"Doubting Thomas," this piece needs no explanation because it resides in this
small room, redolent with religious content, set at eye level next to a
bleeding Jesus on the cross and across from a bleeding St. Francis. In this
setting, the simple installation is palpably transformed into a physical
manifestation of the New Testament tale.
Step into the small Modern Art gallery annex and you will see Louise Lawler's
1986 Well Being hanging comfortably with Gauguin, Matisse, Braque, and
Rouault -- all contemporaries of Fernand Léger, whom Lawler's work is
ostensibly about. On closer examination, however, we discover that the typical
identifying label is not about the photograph but is concerned with the
disparity between financing for health research and military research. Lawler
illustrates this illogical inconsistency by the relative sizes of the pink and
blue areas painted on the wall.
In the early 1980s, Tony Cragg liked to stroll the beaches and gather the
non-biodegradable detritus cast off by thoughtless people and then reassemble
this junk, by color, into a series of "mosaic sculptures." His entry in the
current exhibition can be found stuck to one wall with bits of Velcro in the
new Egyptian gallery. Cragg's Dying Slave is purportedly assembled in
the silhouette of Michaelangelo's famous 16th-century marble sculpture from the
tomb of Julius II. While it is a difficult to get much beyond the fascinating
process of trying to identify each plastic piece, if you stand back and look at
the outline, it is possible to imagine the slave's bent knee and crooked arm.
The added touch of irony is Morgan's placement of the work. Here we are in the
midst of beautiful objects left by the Egyptians. Is this plastic scrap the
legacy we are leaving for future generations?
Dan Flavin provides the sole illumination in one of the hallways, as does
Sarah Seager in the Chapter House. Both of these artists, along with James
Turell and his Stuck Red, are less concerned with the mechanical means
employed to create their light patterns but want us to concentrate on the
effects of the light upon our senses and our psyches.
The remaining installations are displayed in the Hiatt Gallery. Some are
amusing, others irritating, but all are thoughtful endeavors by knowledgeable
artists who each have a message to tell us and have successfully found the
means to deliver it. n
The museum is open Wednesday through Friday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Saturday from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Sunday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Call
799-4406.